It’s a common refrain among social scientists these days: humans need a new story. What kind of story are we talking about? The grand stories that give us a reason to get up in the morning. Storytelling helps us to create our personal identities. They can be just for us, a story that reflects your family history and your personal experience. They can also be shared stories, joining millions in a common theme.
Religions tell such stories. Nations often tell compelling stories. The American Dream is a common story that drove much of the country in the 50’s and 60’s. In the last 20 years, there is talk of the Chinese Dream, the story of China’s growth into a role of international leadership. One story that we lost in the 1990s was the battle between communism and capitalism. It just doesn’t seem relevant in a world where practical capitalism embraces many elements of socialism and Chinese communism has incorporated a new capitalism. The fall of the USSR is often cited as the dramatic end to that story.
Humans need multiple stories to find meaning in life. Change creates the need for new stories and humans are experiencing a period of great tumult. COVID, climate change, political battles, the loss of biological habitats and species; all of these problems weigh on us. Joanna Macy calls it the Great Unravelling. Anxiety creates the need for new stories. The stories can help us to cope with our feelings and be proactive in our response to the challenges.
First Contact with an extraterrestrial civilization would be a new story for humanity, no matter how it would occur. Discovery of a far off signal would be one type of story, profound, but perhaps not immediate. Direct First Contact, if aliens were to visit our solar system, would be another type of story, both profound and immediate. Direct First Contact also would bring with it feelings of fear and concern.
The First Contact story doesn’t have to replace religious or
cultural stories that we have as humans. It would be a mistake to do so. I
think humans will keep many of their stories, based on religions and cultures,
After First Contact. However, First Contact would be a powerful new story and
it could help people find new meaning in life.
Now you’re worried. The aliens will provide us new
meaning in life? No, not the aliens themselves (or more likely their
Artificial Intelligence representatives) at least not from my perspective. The
discovery of an extraterrestrial civilization and the fact that we now have
evidence that we are not alone in the universe is the new meaning. We may or
may not like alien representatives that we meet and they may or may not like
us. Either way, humans will have to find
a new perspective and make changes to our civilization to respond to the needs
of First Contact. In the case of a far off signal being discovered, those
changes may be primarily existential. In the case of Direct First Contact in
our solar system, we would need to make substantive changes and do so very
quickly.
Yuval Harari explains the need for humans to have stories in his book “21 Lessons for the 21st Century.” He also examines the elements of those stories, which he narrows down to two important parts. “To give meaning to my life, a story needs to satisfy just two conditions. First, it must give me some role to play…Second, it must extend beyond my horizons.”
I’m leaving out a lot in between, so please read his book. It is an excellent examination of the challenges facing the human civilization, both now and into the future.
Let’s discuss the first part of a story: it must give me
some role to play. I would argue that every human has a role to play After
First Contact. The impact of First Contact would change human civilization. How
that change happens- how we react and what we do in response- is not a matter
for scientists and world leaders to decide on their own. All humans should have
input. I know in the immediate sense that would not be possible, but the
premise is important, because it establishes the concept that the scientists
and politicians should listen to the wider human community. And in the case of
Direct First Contact, that need would increase as immediate decisions would
have to be made and a framework for further contact established.
I break down the role of humans in these two ways: every
human alive and aware of their surroundings at the time of First Contact would
be part of what I call The Bridge Generation. These would be the only humans to
know life Before First Contact and After First Contact. That unique perspective
will be critical for decision making. Scientists, world leaders, and people
watching at home would all be part of the Bridge Generation.
The First Generation is what I would call those who are born
into the world After First Contact. They will never know what it was like
Before First Contact. Their perspective will be critical because they will not
have the same baggage as the Bridge Generation. And yes, those different
generations would most likely come into conflict as the First Generation comes
to power.
The Bridge Generation and First Generation would set the foundation
for human development for hundreds of years. And that is the second of Harari’s
story elements: the story must extend beyond my horizons. The decisions we
make, especially in a Direct First Contact situation, would impact future
generations. Our stories will need to move us forward to a positive future. But
if we fail, our human stories could just as easily cause us to shrink from the
wider universe and dissolve into conflict and chaos.
No comments:
Post a Comment