Wikipedia uses this definition to describe a civilization: “…any
complex society characterized by urban development, social stratification
imposed by a cultural elite, symbolic systems of communication (for example,
writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the
natural environment.”
I would imagine social scientists argue a fair amount about
what determines a civilization. But let’s use the above definition to discuss
the impact of extraterrestrial First Contact on the human civilization.
Urban development is exploding on planet Earth. Humans are
drawn to cities and those cities are growing huge. It seems unlikely alien
contact would have much influence over urban development. If we are given new
technology by aliens it could help us to better sustain our massive population
growth through more efficient cities. But as I will get to in a moment, there
could be a high cost if we receive such help.
Social stratification is a source of conflict within all
nations on Earth. The forms of stratification and the ability of people to move
from strata to strata seems to be constantly changing. It is also different
from culture to culture and nation to nation. First Contact could have an impact
on social stratification. If we receive information from aliens that introduces
us to how other civilizations in the universe organize themselves- we could
gain a new perspective on our social stratification. That could lead to
conflict and change. And social stratification could be just the tip of the
iceberg.
Our forms of communication would certainly have to evolve if
we had to learn new symbolic systems to talk to alien representatives. Even if
extraterrestrial visitors spoke human languages, we would likely want to learn
about their forms of communication. There could even be some adoption of alien
terms into human languages.
And then there is the perceived separation and domination over
the natural environment. Would aliens consider domination of the natural
environment to be a good thing or bad thing? They could have advice for us
about how to manage our domination without destroying our planet; or for us to
better integrate our development with the natural environment.
The impact to the above mentioned parts of our civilization,
in the wake of extraterrestrial First Contact, seem manageable. Other elements of our civilization may not be
as easy to manage. Science has become a major facet of the human civilization
and under a certain set of circumstances the impact to science could be a
serious concern. It all comes down to information. If we do meet aliens some
day, how much information will they share with us? Will they discuss their
version of science? Will they reveal flaws in our conception of physics,
chemistry and biology? This would, of course, require communication and
understanding. Even if they have the skills to communicate with humans there
could be such a vast difference in our scientific understanding that teaching
us their science could be beyond our comprehension. But if they decided to take
the time to teach us, and put things into terms we could understand, would this
be necessarily be beneficial to humanity? The popular answer has been yes. We
imagine that aliens could help us solve our environmental challenges, perhaps
by providing insight into clean energy sources or even assisting us to
transform our planetary atmosphere by using technology. However, I believe there
is a danger inherent in that line of thinking. Such assistance could put humans
into a position of technical subjugation and that could be dangerous even if
the aliens had altruistic intent. Human science is not an easy process. We
imagine key discoveries just popping up every few years, propelling us forward
to a better life. The truth is much grittier. We have to work hard for those
discoveries. Scientists head down paths before a discovery is made. That is how
the human scientific process works. The good news is that sometimes the
research involved in even the dead end paths provides a bit of insight that
helps us change direction or refine a process. Mistakes can even lead to new
ideas, never before conceived. It is how human development works. The crazy
part of it is that humans often need conflict to move the scientific needle.
Wars, disputes and competition drive us forward. Consider the many scientific
discoveries that have come from our wars. And not just the actual combat
experiences, but also non-combative cold wars. For every weapon created there
is so much knowledge achieved, that it spills out to other uses. I am not
encouraging war. The threat of nuclear annihilation is so negative that it
would seem to outweigh the benefits of nuclear physics thus far. My point is
that we need the gritty human scientific process to keep us moving forward. If
we are spoon fed information, without working for it, we could destroy our
scientific system and dissipate our natural curiosity. One would hope that
aliens would realize this and help us come to some safe method for sharing information.
But we would be wise to find that method on our own.
There is another important aspect of humanity that is
inherent in our civilization, but perhaps not as readily seen: perspective.
Human perspective is behind much of our actions. A shift in perspective can
create major changes in our society. An example can be seen in the #metoo
movement. Sexual harassment and sexual assault has been a concern in the human
civilization for a long time. But the perspective of people in a society makes
a big difference in terms of how such things are handled. There have been
individual reports of sexual harassment of decades. It first became a major
workplace issue in America in the 1990s, largely due to perspective change sparked
by allegations brought up during the Clarence Thomas Supreme Court confirmation
hearings. But that didn’t change what was happening behind the scenes in some
industries. It was the Harvey Weinstein case in 2017 that proved to be the latest
catalyst. The high profile sex harassment accusations against the Hollywood
studio mogul gained attention because celebrities were involved. Brave women
had reported sexual harassment for years, but once a group of celebrities came
forward to accuse Harvey Weinstein, himself a celebrity, the media paid more
attention. This in turn helped to catalyze the wider movement so that more
women came forward with allegations, in even more fields. Perspective change
often requires conflict in the human society. When women stand up to be heard
they are confronting the current power system. When other women and men join in
that confrontation, the movement gains speed and weight. Eventually the overall
perspective, of the majority of humans in a nation, begins to change. Has it
changed that far yet when it comes to sexual harassment? Perhaps not. There is
a long way to go in America and even farther to go in other nations. But many American
men have taken a critical consideration of their workplace interactions with
women, and that is a positive step forward. It’s sad that it takes the risk of
shaming to do such things, but conflict is necessary for change.
My point is that perspective change can often lead to direct
changes in the human civilization. The big question is: What happens if we have
a massive and sudden worldwide perspective change? The discovery of
extraterrestrial life, even microbes on a planet in our solar system, would be
exciting and certainly spark a human perspective change. But the discovery of
active and communicative, intelligent extraterrestrial life would be much more
dramatic. It would not only provide a scientific shift in thinking, but also a
religious shift. The discovery of traveling extraterrestrials could also change
our perspective on safety. Right now we don’t worry about threats from outside
of our solar system. The discovery of aliens would change that, depending on
their ability to travel, and their proximity. The human perspective shift
caused by alien First Contact could take place in many different ways. And the
reaction could be problematic. It could create fear. It could disrupt the order
of our institutions, including government and religion. It could create
conflict between nations.
If alien First Contact does occur some day we will need to
be very cognizant of what the revelation is doing to our civilization. We will need
to quickly assess human thinking with surveys and polling. We will need to
consider risks and benefits. We will need to put a process into place that
protects our civilization while also allowing us to move forward. There will be
a natural conflict between advocates of protectionism and those embracing change.
This conflict could lead to the physical dangers of civil unrest and war between
nations. The best way to manage such a situation would be through the academic
social sciences working in alliance with local, state and national governments.
These would be our first responders: political scientists, sociologists,
anthropologists, and economists. I know this is a shift in thinking. We most
commonly think of physical scientists as our alien first responders. That would
certainly be the case if we discover a far off signal and need to decipher it’s
meaning. However, Direct First Contact would be an entirely different animal,
with a different set of challenges. My fear is that we are not considering this
scenario with enough rigor. It is currently just fodder for fiction in movies
and books.
The human civilization may seem monolithic from our
individual perspective. But take a philosophical step off the Earth for a
moment and have a new look. Human civilization is actually a fragile assemblage
of process, agreements, and traditions. One massive change in human perspective
could rock our foundation. If high information Direct First Contact does occur
some day, we will need to take swift action to protect our civilization and
help it to develop in a positive way for generations to come. Otherwise First
Contact could be like a tsunami hitting a house of cards.
Photo by: Serge-Kutuzov-501664-Unsplash
No comments:
Post a Comment