The recent global economic turmoil has been interesting to watch. It shows that there are hidden dangers in global interdependence. In reality the word "hidden" is probably too strong. Much like the U.S. housing bubble and mortgage craziness a few years back, the Chinese economic crisis was hiding in plain sight. There were many top economists and journalists talking about the China bubble for several years now. I even mentioned their concerns on this blog a few years ago. ( I also mention in that post that global economic turmoil could be a reason for altruistic aliens to make contact.)
I missed this Huffington Post article a while back that showed that world economists are considering what might happen in the wake of First Contact with an extraterrestrial civilization. These are not UFO hunters, but rather serious social scientists. It may be one of the first times I have seen the issue of economic impact of First Contact considered in a thoughtful fashion.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in 2013 was the setting. The group called extraterrestrial contact one of the "unheralded dangers that sneak up on us." The type of economic turmoil would, of course, depend on the type of contact. If we discover evidence of life on far-away planets and that life is not capable of communication, that is one situation. Communication with an extraterrestrial civilization is another. The length of time to communicate with such a civilization is also a factor. With our current science communication with far-off planets would take many years. The amount of information shared, and the speed with which it is shared, will have a big impact on the economic reaction on Earth.
The WEF makes a call for social scientists to take up the issue in a serious fashion. Some global institutions are willing to brave controversy to make a stand. The United Nations should take notice.
Thursday, August 27, 2015
Tuesday, August 4, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: Gearing Up for First Contact
We have the tools
-A planet-wide communication platform
-The ability to reach all humans with messages quickly
-The technology to interact with each other on a
global-basis
-A planet-wide learning platform
We have the
expectations
-Humans want to know more about the universe around them
-Humans want to know what is happening on their own planet
-People want that communication to be objective in nature
-People expect to be engaged
-Humans want to listen to each other and then form opinions
of their own
We have the mental
ability
-Humans can handle rapidly changing situations
-People can digest a great deal of information quickly
-We are resilient
-We can learn new things quickly
-We can update our global perspective when presented with
new information
Is all of this enough to enable humans to handle alien First
Contact with a positive outcome? That can certainly be debated. What is clear
is that we didn’t have many of these tools or attributes even twenty years ago.
We are changing in ways that we could never have imagined. First Contact, in
this environment of massive change, would be simply new challenges and
opportunities for humanity. Perhaps we are ready.
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: The Impossibility of Human Consensus
I often speak of the importance of wide spread human involvement
in the decision making to resolve issues raised by contact with an extraterrestrial
civilization. I am not advocating that everyone be directly involved in the
process- clearly that is not practical on any level. But I do suggest that
humans in countries big and small, and from all over the planet, be represented
in the process. The easiest way to accomplish this would be to use the already existing
system of representation in the United Nations.
It’s a hard topic to discuss without an example. Let’s
consider the possibility of an extraterrestrial civilization reaching out to
humans to make First Contact. In a signal based communication scenario, the
most obvious questions would be: what do we do next? Do we send a message back?
What should that message say? The message the aliens send us would, of course,
be the primary factor driving our decision making process. For this example let’s
have the aliens simply say hello and ask- would you like to trade information
with us? Do we say hello back and beam out the contents of Wikipedia, as has
been suggested by some researchers, and let them sort out who we are? Or do we
send a simpler, targeted message?
The debate already rages in some circles. Recently the issue
was brought up at the American Association for the Advancement of Science
meeting in California. Even before a session on active SETI (sending a signal
to outer space) was held, some scientists spoke out against such actions. Those feelings of caution and concern are held by some
well-known researchers, including legendary astrophysicist Stephen Hawking.
Scientists, governmental leaders, diplomats and academics
will likely be leaders in determining actions to take in the wake of a First Contact
event. Hopefully, they will look to opinion polls to see how humans in various
locations across the globe feel about such responses. There will be fringe
elements vigorously espousing their views in public and in the media. Those
views will need to be considered, as well.
It has been suggested that a group of scientists and other
leaders might make such decisions on their own. I think that would be unwise.
Such important considerations deserve the global reach of a group such as the
United Nations.
The decisions made
are unlikely to make everyone happy. The final decisions could even go against
popular sentiment on the issue. Governmental leaders and others would probably
argue that decision making on a global scale cannot be decided by opinion
polls. In the end, hard decisions will need to be made. Humans will need to
accept this result and do so without violent or disruptive protest. We will have
to have faith in our institutions. This may be tough to swallow for some
humans. It could be especially tough for humans living in countries without
democratic-style representation. Would leaders of a totalitarian regime
consider opinion polls of their countrymen when deciding how their UN
representative should vote on a First Contact issue? It seems unlikely.
The entire process would be a considerable challenge,
because we have nothing to compare it to. Usually the United Nations operates relatively
quietly and out of the scrutiny of the popular media. Most of the publicly
noticed action seems to come in the Security Council. And First Contact issues
may start out there. However, it would be important for the larger issues to
reach the General Assembly for a vote, to ensure greater international
participation in the decisions.
There will be many differing opinions about First Contact,
along a spectrum that would include those opposed to a relationship with extraterrestrials,
to those actively encouraging such a relationship. Not everyone will be happy
with whatever is decided in terms of response. But the debate would be
important to the future of humanity. As long as many differing viewpoints are
considered, and most humans have some sort of representation in the process,
the results should help us move forward in a safe and positive and way.
What do you think? Give your opinion in a comment here or
visit the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Wednesday, June 3, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: Cheer and Fear
In my last entry I spoke of the importance of the sensible
majority- those humans who will have a moderate reaction to First Contact and
carefully consider the decisions necessary for humans to make in the wake of
First Contact. I also mentioned the Cheer and Fear groups: the poles likely to
be found on either end of the human reaction spectrum. The Cheer group would be
people enthusiastically positive about First Contact, and thus more likely to
want open relations with extraterrestrials. The Fear group would be the polar opposite:
they will advocate for little, if any, contact with extraterrestrials.
I think the sensible majority will ultimately have to speak
up and be heard. But there is also an important role for the fringe groups:
they will spark conversation and highlight important concerns in alien contact.
The fringe groups should not be ignored. They will make many valid points.
Eventually, once the debate has progressed, it will be up to the sensible
majority to sort out the issues raised by both poles and come to some sort of moderated
response plan.
The Fear group may be the more interesting of the two. They
will include people who are resistant to change, who follow strict religious
and culture rules, who worry about personal freedoms and cultural freedoms, and
those who are generally wary of new things. This may include people who are
paranoid or militaristic in nature. It may also include human leaders who are
worried about losing their power in the wake of First Contact. As with any
fringe movement, there will be a lot of hyperbole mixed in with sound
arguments. The sensible majority will have to sort out the results.
A little paranoia can go a long way in self-protection. Fear
is an important part of human survival. It keeps us from rushing into
potentially dangerous situations. It can also render us unable to move in new
directions. Fear would be a reasonable reaction in a First Contact situation. It
will be impossible for us to verify what aliens tell humans about their history
of interaction with planet Earth and their intentions in contacting humans.
They may tell us one thing and do another. It is likely that aliens would think
quite differently from humans. Concepts such as honesty and truth may not be a
part of their alien psychology. However, if extraterrestrials, even ones very
different from us, have done their homework, they will understand that concepts
such as honesty and truth mean a lot to humans, even if we don’t always
practice them ourselves.
If aliens are interested in having a safe and productive
relationship with humans they will have done extensive homework. It would be
easy enough to plug into the human Internet and do all sorts of research about
how we behave in various situations. From this research, aliens could develop a
game plan for contacting humans and maintaining a relationship with them. In
that respect, any alien civilization that has been planning the best way to
talk to us will have a huge advantage. They can know quite a bit about us and
we will know nothing about them, until they tell us.
The process of listening to the fringe groups in an extraterrestrial
contact situation will not be easy. The debate is likely to be lively at best
and vociferous in some circumstances. It may appear at first as chaos and hype
on all sides. The sensible majority will need to listen and not rush to
judgment. Governmental and institutional leaders would also be quite important
in this process. Academics, civic leaders and scientists will need to help the
public make sense of the arguments and sort out what is a legitimate concern
and what is not.
Perhaps the most important group in this process will be the
media. First Contact with an extraterrestrial civilization will have to be the
finest hour for the world media if humanity is going to move forward and
prosper from alien contact. The only analogy I can find is the media response
to the 9-11-2001 attacks in the United States. The media spent several days in
a state of heightened awareness- rooting out rumors before reporting on them,
and generally engaging in sober and thoughtful reporting. The world media would
need to follow suit in a First Contract situation and such sober and careful
reporting would need to continue for many months. The 9-11 history is also
instructive for how things could go wrong with media coverage. In the ramp-up
to war, as a result of 9-11, the American media suspended much of its critical
reporting and became cheerleaders for war, with disastrous results.
We will actually need to listen to each other and consider
opposite view points in the wake of First Contact. When it’s apparent that
people are reacting out of political or other gain, we will need to take that
into account. We will need to be on the lookout for opportunists hoping to use
First Contact to build their own power base by using fear or intimidation. First Contact will be a tough time for humanity. There will be much to do and a whole number of possible decisions. We will all have to be at our best. I think we’re up to the challenge.
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: What First Contact Could Mean for You
Most people would expect a flurry of government, science and
media activity if alien contact does occur someday. But what would First
Contact mean for you, the individual human, without any ties to those
institutions? Your primary role would be spectator. Alien contact would likely
have people across the globe glued to their TVs. That may be the only
involvement for the vast majority of humans. But there is another role that
could be critical: a vocal member of the sensible majority.
Join in on the conversation on the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
What is the sensible majority? It’s the group that tends to
take a more measured response to controversial issues. You can call it moderate
or middle-of-the-road. It describes a set of humans at the center of a
reactionary scale. At either pole are the fringe groups. For alien First
Contact one would imagine that these fringe groups will be comprised of those
who are very enthusiastic about extensive contact with members of alien
civilizations and those who are against any contact. You could call it the
cheer and fear dichotomy. The sensible majority would have feelings of
excitement about First Contact, mixed with concerns about First Contact. The
result might be cautious optimism. How can we make such assumptions of human
reaction based on an event that has no equal in human history? I think such a
continuum of reaction is a part of human nature. Some of us react quite
strongly to issues and divide into opposite poles and others tend to weigh both
sides and find value in both. The degree to which this occurs would of course
be dependent on how First Contact occurs. If it’s a scary and mysterious First
Contact you could expect human reaction to be weighted towards the fear pole.
If it’s a transparent and positive event, one would expect reaction to be
weighted towards the cheer pole.
What does this matter? Human reaction would be the most
critical part of First Contact. Fear would provoke a set of actions by
governments and institutions. Cheer would produce a different set of actions. This
is important, because those governments and institutions will need to make
decisions in the wake of First Contact that could impact humanity for many
generations to come.
Once again, it seems important that the sensible majority be
heard in such a situation. But there is a problem: the sensible majority tends
to be quiet. Moderates are not usually found marching in the streets. That
behavior is reserved for people at either end of the spectrum. The problem is
that media coverage focuses on the actions of the polar groups. It’s tough for
the media to put human reaction to issues in a moderate context, because the
moderates are quiet and don’t create “newsworthy” events. The only hope
moderates have is to be heard through opinion polls, which can show the
moderate viewpoints much better than media stories.
First Contact would likely fall into a similar scenario.
Fringe groups on either end of the spectrum would be quite vocal, and perhaps
violently so. The media will rush to cover the excitement and the result will
be a lack of context. This could be quite dangerous. If governmental policy is
shaped by fringe groups, poor decisions could be made. First Contact would
require careful and thoughtful decision making. Unfortunately, those decisions
will also need to be made quickly. It will be a real challenge.
So, what can the sensible majority do in the wake of First
Contact? The answer is simple: stand up and be heard. Don’t allow the fringe
groups to garner all the attention. Humans across the planet will need to make
sure their voices are heard. Governmental leaders will be watching human
reaction closely, looking for cues. The sensible majority will need to get out
on the streets and show their numbers. This won’t be easy. The fringe elements
will have religious, political and social groups to guide their actions. The
sensible majority has no such organizations. It will be up to individual humans
to make their voices heard through social media and public activities.
Am I advocating a chaos of protests and counter-protests?
Certainly not. I am suggesting peaceful demonstrations of views and attitudes
for those who represent moderates in the First Contact conversation.
You may be wondering if any of this will be necessary. You
may think that human reaction will muted and well-considered. I wish this would
be the case. It may be in the first days and weeks after First Contact. But if
humans react as they have for thousands of years of human history, it seems
likely that the fringe groups will eventually form and the debate will rage. Be
prepared to stand up for what you believe or expect to be drowned out.
Join in on the conversation on the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Friday, May 1, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: Human Space Wars and Visiting Extraterrestrials
An extraterrestrial pilot, hoping to land a spacecraft on the planet Earth, would have to be quite stealthy. The various orbit zones around Earth are watched very closely by a number of nations and agencies. The reasons for that monitoring are varied. Some groups keep track of asteroids and other natural objects that have the potential of getting close to the Earth. Others plot man-made space debris, down to minute sizes, left in orbit around the Earth. And still others are keeping an eye on satellites and satellite movement. Those concerns are primarily military in nature. Satellites do important work for humans these days: GPS, communications, weather monitoring, spy surveillance and missile monitoring. The importance of space to the U.S. military was highlighted in a recent 60 Minutes report. It showed the degree to which military powers in several nations, including the U.S., China and Russia, are involved in a military space race of sorts. While active weapons are still banned from space, as part of a 1967 UN treaty, the 60 Minutes piece showed the extent to which the U.S. military is working to protect U.S. satellites and plan for a retaliatory strike against opposing satellites and platforms in space.
It’s safe to assume that if extraterrestrials decide to
visit Earth some day, that they will have quite advanced technology. The very
fact that they could send a craft to Earth would make them more technologically
advanced than us. It would also be easy to assume that their technology would
allow extraterrestrials to sneak through our Earth orbit monitoring systems.
But it would be quite the feat. The signature of a spacecraft engine would be
something noticeable to amateur astronomers, NASA and other groups, well before
it ever reached Earth orbit. In far Earth orbit, a visiting spacecraft would
have many agencies, in several different nations, watching its progress
closely.
One of those agencies would be U.S. Air Force SpaceCommand. They recently came out in a
public statement declaring a new mission to use satellites in geosynchronous
orbit to monitor other satellites. They call the mission the Space Surveillance
Network. It’s a bold statement, most likely designed to send a message to China
and Russia. The 60 Minutes story pointed out that China recently sent a missile
into space to destroy one of its own satellites in a test. This is something
Americans have done, as well.
How much of a threat this monitoring would be to alien
visitors would depend on the technological prowess of the extraterrestrials.
While it is true that any extraterrestrial civilization capable of traveling to
our solar system would have a technological advantage over us, it is pure
speculation to say that alien technology would have the ability to overcome
human space monitoring and missile deployment. Human technology would be most
likely be very different than alien technology. If the aliens had just arrived
in our solar system, that could be problematic. It could take years of study
for visiting extraterrestrials to understand the complexity of human systems.
After all, human systems were designed from the human perspective, using human
senses. It’s quite possible that alien perspective, and senses, would be much
different than ours.
Aliens without stealth technology would be advised to phone
ahead, so to speak. They would want to communicate their intentions in a way
that humans could easily pick-up and decipher. This would at least assure that
all space-monitoring agencies were aware of a visit and would be less likely to
have a hostile reaction. The biggest risk in a surprise visit could be
confusion. If the United States was to perceive that an alien craft was a
threat to U.S. satellites, and that the spacecraft in question was deployed by
China, there could be retribution. Conflict in space could lead to conflict on
the ground.
It all comes down to human vulnerabilities. We have much of
our technology based on satellite assistance. We feel quite vulnerable in space.
It is an area in which visiting extraterrestrials would have to use great
caution. Humans are a jumpy lot and despite smiling faces here on Earth among
our politicians, in space, decades old hostilities remain quite fresh.
What do you think? Give your opinion in a comment here or
visit the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Monday, April 6, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: The Problem with Abduction Reports
Claims of alien abduction are the foundation of a robust
subculture in human society. Whether those claims are true or not, the issue of
possible alien interference in human lives is something that would need to be
addressed in the wake of Direct First Contact. By Direct First Contact I mean
an alien civilization that has traveled to our solar system and communicated
with us. Such a situation would raise an obvious set of questions: have these
visitors or other visitors come to Earth in the past? Did they conduct biological
experiments on Earth? Did those experiments involve humans? Exactly when and
where did such contact occur?
Security would be a major concern in the wake of a Direct
First Contact event. Due to the very nature of the situation- space-faring
aliens in our solar system – there is a possible threat to humanity. We would
need to be very protective of our celestial neighborhood and certainly Earth
itself. We would have many questions. Hopefully, visiting aliens would come in
peace, but it would be wise for us to be cautious and security minded at every
step. And I don’t think a military attack of some sort is the only danger.
Interference in human politics and governance could be quite harmful. Perhaps
the most likely concern should be un-intended consequences of contact with
aliens: disruption to the world economic markets, political disturbances and
other purely human problems.
We would need to set up guidelines for contact immediately. I
have outlined these basic Human Rights that could apply to any alien contact
situation:
1. Humans have the right to self-determination.
2. Humans have a right to not be manipulated by other civilizations.
3. Humans have a right not to have the pillars of human society manipulated by other civilizations, including economy, technology, and civic arrangements.
4. The planet Earth is the sacred home of human beings.
5. Life on Earth should not be interfered with or manipulated by outside beings.
6. Humans have a right to determine how First Contact proceeds.
7. Humans can determine how much information and what type of information they decide to receive about the outside universe.
8. The resources of the planet Earth are the property of citizens of Earth.
9. The solar system of Earth is the property and home of citizens of Earth.
10. Earthlings can decide which beings can enter the solar system and under what conditions.
11. Earthlings can decide which beings can enter Earth atmosphere and under what conditions.
12. Humans will enter into the larger known universe as productive and responsible citizens.
13. Humans will decide exactly how that entry into the larger known universe proceeds.
14. Humans will expect honesty from all parties interacting with the citizens of planet Earth.
15. Humans will demand honesty and forthright disclosure of any past interactions between alien civilizations and people of the planet Earth.
2. Humans have a right to not be manipulated by other civilizations.
3. Humans have a right not to have the pillars of human society manipulated by other civilizations, including economy, technology, and civic arrangements.
4. The planet Earth is the sacred home of human beings.
5. Life on Earth should not be interfered with or manipulated by outside beings.
6. Humans have a right to determine how First Contact proceeds.
7. Humans can determine how much information and what type of information they decide to receive about the outside universe.
8. The resources of the planet Earth are the property of citizens of Earth.
9. The solar system of Earth is the property and home of citizens of Earth.
10. Earthlings can decide which beings can enter the solar system and under what conditions.
11. Earthlings can decide which beings can enter Earth atmosphere and under what conditions.
12. Humans will enter into the larger known universe as productive and responsible citizens.
13. Humans will decide exactly how that entry into the larger known universe proceeds.
14. Humans will expect honesty from all parties interacting with the citizens of planet Earth.
15. Humans will demand honesty and forthright disclosure of any past interactions between alien civilizations and people of the planet Earth.
I believe that the final point would
require a series of interviews or hearings of some sort. A visiting alien
civilization would likely be much older than ours, and thus may have had contact
with humans in the past. It would be important that visitors lay out a clear
history of their actions in our solar system.
We also must consider the possibility
that multiple alien civilizations have visited our solar system in the
past. This would make things more
complicated. Perhaps visiting aliens would say- “we’ve never done anything bad
to humans, but there is another civilization out there that you should know about.”
Or perhaps there was a change in alien policy in terms of interaction with
humans? Consider how often policy changes occur for governments here on Earth.
Is it a stretch to think such problems might occur in an alien civilization?
I personally don’t believe that aliens
have visited Earth in our lifetime or that they have abducted humans. But I
have no evidence one way or another. There would be plenty of questions to ask
in the wake of any First Contact situation.
Some of you may have issues with this
post. Please, feel free to post comments on the blog. I appreciate you reading.
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: The Elite, The Disenfranchised and First Contact
A small number of scientists are leading the search for
extraterrestrial intelligence. From that research-based scientific inquiry, a
few have also been considering the challenges that would come from alien First
Contact. These questions include the process that should be used to inform the
public of such a discovery, and how a response to alien contact would be
developed. These scientists have been primarily astrophysicists and astronomers.
In recent years, though, through the efforts of groups such as the SETI Institute and the NASA AmesResearch Center, biologists, anthropologists, sociologists and religious
experts joined the conversation. Most of the effort is still focused on the scientific
inquiry. That makes sense. Without the discovery itself, the rest of the issues
are moot. But there is a growing realization that we are not prepared for what
might happen after First Contact. Do we reply? What do we say? Who makes these
decisions?
The International Academy of Astronomics (IAA) and the International Astronomical Union (IAU) have suggested that scientists would be heavily involved in such decisions. Certainly, in a case of Indirect First Contact- the reception or interception of an extraterrestrial signal or message- scientists would lead they way. They would be the ones who made the discovery and it makes sense that they would be the ones that the world would turn to for advice on what to do next. The good thing about indirect First Contact is that it would likely give us time to ponder such decisions. There could be a healthy debate and, hopefully, then a consensus about how to proceed. These very scientists have attempted to get the United Nations to consider the issue. There would be a great need for international leadership in the wake of First Contact and a coalition of scientists and international leaders would be a good start for developing responses to First Contact. Unfortunately, the United Nations has yet to take substantive action.
Just last month scientists at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting discussed the issue of sending intentional human messaging into space in hopes of making contact. The arguments ranged from those favoring the approach to those warning of dire results if we make contact.
Initially, in the wake of Direct First Contact, a coalition
of scientists and international leaders, perhaps under the umbrella of the
United Nations would also make sense. But that umbrella would need to expand
quickly. Astrophysicists and astronomers would need to be joined by, not only
the above-mentioned biologists, anthropologists, sociologists and religious
experts, but also by political scientists, and economists. The potential
disruption to human civilization would be a primary concern in the wake of
Direct First Contact. The amount of information shared would ramp up those
concerns.
But there is another fact that we would have to face in such
a situation. Scientists, academics and international leaders are part of an
elite segment of our society. I know the word elite, especially concerning
academics, has been used as a political club for ideological bludgeoning
recently in America, but nonetheless, there is a valid point to be made. Can
those in the top income brackets and the higher leadership circles in human
civilization, necessarily speak out for the rights of the larger, poorer,
majority of humans?
I think that bodies formed in the wake of First Contact should
include people who represent third world nations and humans who live in poverty.
Governments of those nations could be involved through representation in the
United Nations. They would need to have a role. As I have pointed out
previously, it would be easy for humans to let the most powerful nations run
the show. That would be a mistake. First Contact response should be developed
with a wide range of ideas and opinions. That cannot be gained from just a few
powerful nations. I would suggest that non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that
represent those in poverty, from third world nations, would be a good place to
start. Someone will need to advocate for the needs of the less powerful humans
on planet Earth. First Contact cannot be the province of elites. The voices of
middle and lower class people, and especially those living in poverty, need to
be considered.
Would such an approach make things more complicated in the
wake of First Contact? Absolutely. Adding more debate to already divisive alien
contact issues would not be easy. It would make it tougher to develop a
response. If not carefully managed it could lead to chaos. It is a problem
worth managing. All segments of human society have a right to be heard when it
comes to First Contact response.
This is the process that must be developed. We should be
thinking about it now, both in the context of Indirect, signal-based Contact
and immediate communication based Direct First Contact. Alien contact may not
occur for many years or decades. It may never occur at all. But the
implications for humanity are huge. We must be ready to act with at least a
very basic plan of response. A little thought now into the development of that
plan, and methods to help all humans be involved, would help tremendously.
Join in on the conversation on the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: Who Controls Alien First Contact?
It’s a simple question and a question for which there are
probably no simple answers. In many respects, though, the question of who
should control alien First Contact comes down to whom you trust more-
individual governments or humans as a whole. That may sound like a
generalization and I agree, those are very broad terms. But at the heart of the
issue is a simple philosophy that would be the subject of great debate: I
believe that all humans should participate in alien First Contact. How could
this happen? Through international representation and vigorous debate.
Government control is the most popular scenario in books and
movies. It seems to stem from 1950’s post-nuclear fears. In the movies, we
humans look to the military for expertise and leadership in the wake of alien
contact. Interestingly, in many of those plot lines, the military leaders
eventually screw-up the mission, by trying to exert too much control. And
that’s the problem. We would likely have some degree of anxiety in alien
contact and having the military in charge is a way to protect ourselves. But
eventually we could question the motives of the military. Will they keep the
event secret and try to gain technological advantages though alien contact?
Will the government deem alien contact too dangerous for the public to know
about?
These are simplistic scenarios, but I think they do mirror
our fears and concerns. We want someone to be in control and to protect us,
however we worry about what that might mean in the long-term.
This is something astrophysicists involved in the search for
extraterrestrial intelligence have been considering for some time now. The most
well-known protocol comes from the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA).
The protocol calls for scientific confirmation of the signal
discovery before any public announcement is made. The next step involves
notifying other scientists of the discovery and confirmation. The next level is
scientific associations and governmental leaders. The United Nations is listed,
as well, with perhaps the strongest role in the protocol and the specific
mention of a UN Committee- the Committee on the Peace Uses of Outer Space.
Such a protocol is relatively straightforward. It is
supported by well-regarded scientific associations and it follows procedures
that might be used for other astronomical discoveries. There is a ready-made
system for the first level of extraterrestrial signal detection. Best of all,
the instruments (radio telescopes) used for such signal detection are
controlled primarily by scientists and academic institutions. There is a
certain amount of openness built into their usual process of communication.
Direct First Contact would be different. In such a case, the
most likely first responders would be law enforcement and the military, in
whatever jurisdiction a craft landed or made direct contact with humans. That
provides a level of institutional control. The authorities may support
transparency and public observation of such an event. They may also choose to
hide the event and subsequent interaction.
That’s why I suggest a sudden, media-based First Contact
scenario. If done correctly, transparency and openness would be an integral
part of the event. Institutions could seek to gain control of the situation,
but the media scrutiny would create pressure on law enforcement and the
military to be transparent in actions and accountable to the public.
There is no doubt that First Contact needs to be led by
someone. It could be a coalition of scientific, governmental, and academic groups,
as suggested in the IAA protocol. The obvious group to lead such an effort
would be the United Nations, as it is the largest and most robust international
agency on the planet. The UN provides a system of representation for the great majority
of nations on Earth. It has built-in systems of bureaucracy that could be
applied to First Contact. Most importantly, it is a body that is designed to
foster discussion and debate among nations. That exists nowhere else on the
planet to such a degree.
Direct First Contact is an unlikely event, due to the vast
distances of space and the constraints of physics, as we understand the field
currently. It is not, however, entirely out of the realm of possibility. If it
were to occur there will be an inevitable conflict between the public right to
know and the governmental mission of protection. There will need to be careful
thought given to each and every step.
Join in on the conversation on the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Wednesday, January 7, 2015
Extraterrestrial Contact: The Human Opportunity
If alien First Contact does occur someday, we will focus our
attention to the wonders of the wider universe. Whatever we learn about other
extraterrestrial civilizations and the nature of our universe will in turn help
to expand our perspective. Of course, how much we learn depends on how much
extraterrestrials might be willing to share. Once the wonder dies down the
perspective change could also provide a catalyst for human self-examination.
I’m not suggesting that we need to act like aliens or
incorporate an alien way of thinking. Learning about other civilizations does
not mean becoming like other civilizations. The knowledge that we are not alone
in the universe, in and of itself, could help us to make changes here at home.
These would be purely human decisions about how to make our world better for
everyone. Why should we care? First Contact would present something that we
never had to consider before. If another civilization exists, suddenly we have
competition in the universe- perhaps not immediate competition for resources or
status, but competition nonetheless. We would want to consider our strengths as
a civilization and that means coming up with ideas for improving on our
weaknesses.
Global Decision-Making
There would be some immediate needs in extraterrestrial
contact. We would need a global body to make decisions and take actions
regarding alien contact for the entire human race. This could be a newly created
group representing all nations or it could be a United Nations committee. The
group would need to consider the contact process and what messages should come
from humans.
The need for speaking with one voice would make overall
global decision-making suddenly much more important. And it would force us to
consider a basic fact about our current global relations: they’re dominated by
a few powerful nations. In the wake of First Contact, who would be working to
ensure that the people of Belize have their voices heard? Who would stand up for
the concerns of citizens of Uzbekistan?
Some people might argue that the largest and most powerful
nations have the most at stake and the best scientific resources, and thus
should lead the effort. But I think that allowing that current system of global
inequity to continue would be a mistake. It could also lead to power struggles
amongst those power nations. Truly soliciting input from smaller nations, and actually
acting on that input, could prevent the power struggles, by adding additional
voices to the mix. It could also bring about ideas that we might not have
considered.
Powerful nations should view First Contact as an opportunity
to lead, not dominate. True leadership comes from recognizing the value of all
of the parts of the whole. This will not be easy for the United States, China
and Russia. Current politics makes the quest for dominance part of the
international agenda. This, however, leads to conflict and in the end, weakens
all parties. How so? Just look at the interdependence of economies. We live in
a world where economic problems in China can lead to economic problems in the
United States. When we quietly applaud as the Ruble falls in value in Russia,
we forget that interdependence. Russian economic turmoil may seem like a positive
thing for Western nations in the short term, especially for those upset by
Russian international aggressions, but in the long-term, Russian financial
issues could have a negative global impact for multi-national companies and
that has an impact on economies all over the world.
Racism, Sexism and
Culturalism
Meeting alien beings should make it quite apparent that differences
in human skin tones, facial features and cultural beliefs, are slight when
compared to extraterrestrials. We could use that perspective shift to push for a
new understanding between human cultures. We are all brothers and sisters. We
are all related. We know this. Alien First Contact would take that knowledge
beyond the intellectual level and give it new primacy. We are all humans. We
live on this tiny planet with many other creatures and organisms. We need to
take care of each other and take care of our fragile home.
The entire planet suffers from the consequences of sexism. Women
are nearly half of all humans and yet they often do not have the same
opportunities as men. This includes education and employment. There is no
greater need for positive change on Earth. All women should have opportunities
for self-betterment and the ability to make their own choices.
A renewed focus on human concerns could also have a
downside. Some people may attempt to use fear to build xenophobia towards
aliens. This would be a natural tendency, especially if the aliens look and act
much differently from us, which seems likely. Promoting a stronger human
alliance does not have to lead to such xenophobia. But the struggle to keep it
from becoming so, and thus influencing our decision making in regards to alien
contact, will likely be with us for the rest of human history.
Violence
A sudden First Contact event could help us realize that
things can change quickly. Perspective controls much of what we do. If our
perspective on the universe can change so quickly, and without much physical
action, than why couldn’t our perspective on human issues change, as well?
Much of the progress made in the American civil rights
struggle came relatively quickly once the world focused attention on the plight
of African-Americans in the South. Media attention and the leadership of some
key individuals helped to change something in the American consciousness.
Perspective is an incredible thing.
I’m not suggesting that the civil rights movement didn’t
come from years of incredibly daring and dangerous work on the parts of so many.
What I am suggesting is that there can be a tipping point in human
consciousness where one state of affairs quickly becomes unacceptable due to
publicity and leadership. What other areas might we be able to improve human
conditions based on a new perspective brought on by First Contact.
What about violence? It’s easy to say that humans will be
humans and violent conflict between humans is inevitable, but in the wake of
First Contact we could realize that human violence is a choice, not an
inevitability. We make such choices each and every day. Clearly, the key to preventing human violence
starts with solving the problems that lead to violence and that is extremely complicated.
But a perspective change could allow us
to climb out of the trenches, where we are surrounded by those complications,
and achieve a wider view. The catalyst of First Contact could lead to a change
in how humans resolve conflicts.
The Environment
It would be interesting to hear the alien perspective on
climate change as a result of industrial growth. Perhaps such problems are endemic
in growing civilizations? We could desperately use some new input on the
subject and that would perhaps encourage us to take our environmental decisions
more seriously, and, in turn, prod us to make the many changes needed to
respond to the growing crisis.
Technology and attitude changes have made a difference in
pollution and waste in the United States. But Americans have the furthest to
go, as we are among the biggest consumers. Emerging nations need to pay better
attention to environmental issues. China may seem like an extreme example now,
with widespread pollution in its large cities, but India, Malaysia and Latin
American nations are not far behind. As economies grow, consumer pollution and
waste increases. Could a new perspective help us to take bolder actions to
preserve the health of our atmosphere and ultimately our planet?
Poverty
Humans have a propensity to support economic systems that
keep other humans in poverty. Human development is closely watched by the
United Nations and other international agencies. In some parts of the world,
such as Asia, it has improved greatly in the last 30 years. In other locations,
most notably sub-Saharan Africa, it has improved marginally at best. The UN
calls people in poverty “vulnerable” because it defines a whole range of
impacts, from employment to health. Could we see humans differently in the wake
of First Contact and make significant changes to help those humans who are most
vulnerable?
I know that these are rather grand pronouncements. When it
comes to human change the devil is always in the details. Real change comes
from individual struggle each and every day. But that struggle for positive
change could be energized by the change in perspective that would come from
extraterrestrial contact. If First Contact does occur some day, we will likely
be slack-jawed in wonder for a time. Once we get back to reality, we should use
some of that wonder and turn our attention back to planet Earth. Alien First
Contact could be a catalyst for positive human change unlike anything we have
ever seen. That catalyst could also be ignored and it could be business as
usual on planet Earth. That decision will be ours to make.
Join in on the conversation on the Alien First Contact Facebook page.
Friday, December 5, 2014
Extraterrestrial Contact: Nurtured Life on Earth
If contact with an extraterrestrial civilization occurs
someday, there will be an immediate question: has the extraterrestrial
civilization been in contact with humans previously? This question wouldn’t just
come from those who claim alien abduction or envision some vast alien
conspiracy. It’s a basic question with huge implications. There is one
particular category that might be important to explore now: has life on Earth
been nurtured by alien intervention?
Scientists recently announced in the journal Nature that they have discovered a force field of sorts about 7,200 miles above the Earth that stop most of these energized electrons from reaching Earth. This is part of the overall study of the Van Allen Belts, two radiation belts that surround the Earth. NASA has probes that have been studying the belts. They hope to use them to further analyze this “puzzling phenomenon” as it is described by the co-author of the study, Daniel Baker from CU-Boulder. This is a Huffington Post article describing the results.
None of these folks are suggesting that the phenomenon is something that was intentionally created. But it does provide an opportunity to raise the question: what if life on Earth has been nurtured? Perhaps there are many aspects of our planet that were engineered to better suit the development of life? If so, what does that mean for us? If we find out that aliens have been helping us along, does that mean we are beholden to them? Are they our Gods? That probably seems an offensive thought to most of us. And if it was true that we had help along the way, do we ask for more help? Do we sit back and ask to be spoon-fed alien science?
But I go back to my original point- we will have legitimate questions to ask a visiting extraterrestrial civilization in the wake of First Contact. And if it ever does occur no question will be too outlandish. The alien abduction folks will have just as much a right to an answer as anyone else. Until we know the truth, anything is possible. There will be many questions to ask in the wake of First Contact. Perhaps most disturbingly, at least at first, humans would be unable to verify what aliens tell us about their history with the planet Earth. Do we trust their answers? That’s why it doesn’t hurt to consider these general issues now. A little forethought could be a valuable thing if First Contact ever does occur someday.
Nurturing life on Earth could come in many forms. In the
most dramatic, writers have suggested that ancient earth societies had
interaction with aliens and even benefited from that interaction. Many of these
theories have been debunked as historians have learned how the pyramids were
built or the Nazca lines in Peru possibly created. But nurturing life on Earth
doesn’t have to mean such drastic interaction. Life itself is widely accepted
to be a rare creation, due to the formidable obstacles faced in the formation
of life. Asteroid strikes and atmospheric imbalances are just a couple of the
events that could render most of life on a planet extinct. Intelligent life,
due to its complexity, would likely be at high risk for extinction from
naturally occurring events. And, of course, atmospheric imbalances could also
be a byproduct of technological development, as is becoming an issue here on
Earth.
But what about less dramatic intervention? Humans face a risk from the effects of coronal mass ejection. Highly energetic particle bombarding the Earth
could cause a massive disruption to the electrical system and even health risks
for humans. But highly energized electrons are streaming towards the Earth on a
regular basis.Scientists recently announced in the journal Nature that they have discovered a force field of sorts about 7,200 miles above the Earth that stop most of these energized electrons from reaching Earth. This is part of the overall study of the Van Allen Belts, two radiation belts that surround the Earth. NASA has probes that have been studying the belts. They hope to use them to further analyze this “puzzling phenomenon” as it is described by the co-author of the study, Daniel Baker from CU-Boulder. This is a Huffington Post article describing the results.
None of these folks are suggesting that the phenomenon is something that was intentionally created. But it does provide an opportunity to raise the question: what if life on Earth has been nurtured? Perhaps there are many aspects of our planet that were engineered to better suit the development of life? If so, what does that mean for us? If we find out that aliens have been helping us along, does that mean we are beholden to them? Are they our Gods? That probably seems an offensive thought to most of us. And if it was true that we had help along the way, do we ask for more help? Do we sit back and ask to be spoon-fed alien science?
The human race has struggled for thousands of years.
Struggle is part of our way of being. We need to keep struggling to survive.
And doing so will make us more technologically advanced and, hopefully, wiser
in our human relations. Taking away the struggle, even with some simple
technological assistance from an extraterrestrial civilization, could be
detrimental. If we do find out that we have had help along the way, I think we
would want to make sure that we are not get spoon-fed anything involving
technology or culture. Learning from aliens about their culture and other
aspects of the universe would be an exciting and welcome benefit of First
Contact. We would need to make sure we placed controls over the information shared,
so that we continue to struggle in our science and development, without outside
help.
Okay, let’s take a deep breath again. The Van Allen Belts
electron shield is probably just a natural phenomenon that we don’t understand
yet. Scientists will put in the hard work and analyze data and help us come to
a new understanding about our world.But I go back to my original point- we will have legitimate questions to ask a visiting extraterrestrial civilization in the wake of First Contact. And if it ever does occur no question will be too outlandish. The alien abduction folks will have just as much a right to an answer as anyone else. Until we know the truth, anything is possible. There will be many questions to ask in the wake of First Contact. Perhaps most disturbingly, at least at first, humans would be unable to verify what aliens tell us about their history with the planet Earth. Do we trust their answers? That’s why it doesn’t hurt to consider these general issues now. A little forethought could be a valuable thing if First Contact ever does occur someday.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Extraterrestrial Contact: Religious Reaction Expanded
Religious
reaction to First Contact with an extraterrestrial civilization is important,
primarily because it could be a driver for overall human reaction. Vanderbilt
University Astronomy Professor David Weintraub has a new book out called “Religions and Extraterrestrial
Life: How will we deal with it?”
I appreciate
the straight to the point title. While I have not read the book yet, from the
articles and reviews describing the work, he seems to cover more ground in his
book than most articles or surveys have done. Particularly interesting for a
quick view is the overall survey of different religions put together from his
book by the Boston Globe. Weintraub says that the revelation of extraterrestrial
life could actually bolster the spirits of Muslims, who have long believed that
other worlds with intelligent beings exist. Perhaps most importantly, Islam
doesn’t say that human religious systems have to apply to extraterrestrials,
but that each world would have its own prophets. That would allow wiggle room
that many other religions on planet Earth, including fundamentalist Christian
sects, could not provide. It’s those fundamentalist Christians that Weintraub
seems most worried about in terms of reaction.
That’s an
interesting perspective. From a purely religious text standpoint, such
reactions seem relatively easy to figure out. What worries me is the nexus of
religion, politics and government. It is here where the real impact of religion
can be felt and especially in extremist religions. Will world leaders find
religious reasons to oppose First Contact with extraterrestrials? Will they try
to use religion to sway public sentiment in one direction or another, in issues
important to extraterrestrial contact? It seems likely, considering that such
actions combining religion and political control are taken each and every day here
on Earth currently and involve just about every religion on the planet.
Religion does not exist in a vacuum. It is just part of the fabric making up
our institutional quilt of society. All sorts of people: religious leaders,
politicians, and even military despots and terrorists, pull on those strings to
get their way.
I look
forward to reading Weintraub’s book. Here is a Huffington Post article about it
in his own words and a You Tube video.
Check out
the Alien First Contact Facebook page for more questions about the impact of
First Contact on the human race.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)